CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating IOTA Contest Remotely

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating IOTA Contest Remotely
From: jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: "jpescatore@aol.com" <jpescatore@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:16:32 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm a long time and enthusiastic remote operator but it really is up to each 
contest sponsor to choose rules -we don't need every contest to be the same. 
You can influence the sponsors by contacting them directly - not by just 
posting here!
An example: state QSO parties have been realizing they need to update their 
rules: does the operator need to be in state to be called an in-state entry and 
mult, or just the station,  or both?
A few years ago one of the states updated their rules to say both op and 
station had to be in-state and enough remote enthusiasts contacted the sponsor 
and they changed the rule.
The next state QSO party and VHF contest leap: the overhyped autonomous car and 
the remotely piloted mobile county/rover grid traversing vehicle...
73 John K3TN
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>