CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting

To: Chris Tate - N6WM <chris.tate@gmail.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting
From: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 21:05:17 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Pandora's box was opened when ARRL made this rule change.  We are just at the 
beginning of the evolution (devolution?) to come.

They have essentially said that anything goes.  Cluster, social media, you name 
it.

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+k5zd=outlook.com@contesting.com> On Behalf 
Of Chris Tate - N6WM
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2024 3:17 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting

I have thought about the use of call sign prefixes from other countries to 
defeat others filters while self spotting and feel this is a dishonest loophole 
that should be closed.  Crafty?  No I don't think so, and opens up an entire 
Pandora's box of what can be manipulated in the cluster networks.  And it's 
essentially a false statement and should result in a DQ. This self spotting 
experiment will get out of hand very quick if this is allowed to continue.  A 
simple rule addition stating that you must use Your operating call to self spot 
(without false prefix) will solve this micro issue, but there are other 
nefarious things possible with this self spotting rule and the existing cluster 
network.  honestly am a little disappointed with the usually highly respected 
contesters that chose to exploit this loophole to the detriment of their 
competitors.

Chris
N6WM
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>