| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ? |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:33:59 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 3/10/2024 11:13 AM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote: What are people thoughts on using a totally unique prefix in the 2 x CQWPX contests? It makes things more interesting during the final hours. I use our small club's call, KU6W. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ?, David Hachadorian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting, Randy Thompson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ?, Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ?, Mike Ritz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |