| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ? |
| From: | "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:13:49 -0300 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
What are people thoughts on using a totally unique prefix in the 2 x CQWPX contests? Do you feel it increases your score any appreciable amount ? 5%? 10% Not being assisted very much I have very limited experience "clicking on spots" but I can at least imagine a scenario whereby S&Pers are only clicking on Mults and not also regular Q's who would not have a unique prefix...but how much, I have no idea. Thoughts? Mike VE9AA Mike - Keswick Ridge, NB, Canada _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Int'l DX contest SSB logging query, VE7MHI John D Erskine via CQ-Contest |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 7% of contesters self spotted in ARRL DX SSB 2024 - twice as many as in CW, Richard F DiDonna NN3W |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL Int'l DX contest SSB logging query, VE7MHI John D Erskine via CQ-Contest |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ?, David Hachadorian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |