Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] slam tally

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] slam tally
From: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 13:44:44 +0100
Rich Measures wrote:
>
>>neither should one publicly attack
>>the intelligence, integrity, morals or honesty of one's opponent ...
>
>?  Would you consider it bad form to state that alleged facts were 
>contradicted by the personnel dept. of the former employer?
>
Yes, it's bad form, because:

(a) Your assertion - which is contradicted by several other sources -
is based on a telephone conversation with some random person in HR who
had no incentive to give you strictly accurate information;

but more importantly:

(b) The whole point of your pursuit of Mr Miklos seems to be to smear
his personal integrity because his technical judgement differs from
yours.

Rotten bad form, old chap... can't you see that?

73 from Ian G3SEK          Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
                          'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
                           http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>