>
>Hopefully, the acrimony of disagreement can be tempered by adherence to the
>usages of polite debate. Thus, even if the opposing view is considered to be
>infantile bunk dreamed up by a demented mind, one does not say so publicly
>(private correspondance is different);
? Infantile bunk tends to be self-advertising.
>neither should one publicly attack
>the intelligence, integrity, morals or honesty of one's opponent ...
? Would you consider it bad form to state that alleged facts were
contradicted by the personnel dept. of the former employer?
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|