To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] slam tally |
From: | Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick) |
Date: | Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:50:32 +0100 |
Rich says; >? Would you consider it bad form to state that alleged facts were >contradicted by the personnel dept. of the former employer? Rebuttal of facts is an accepted part of debate. To say that evidence is available to rebut a set of facts stated by one of the parties, and to produce that evidence is one thing - and is acceptable: but if one said that 'these facts presented by Mr. X are lies and I'm going to prove it', I'd class that not only as unacceptable, but purposely inflammatory and insulting. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] slam tally, Rich Measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] TL-922 Filament Transformer Protection, Ian White, G3SEK |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] slam tally, Pete Smith |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] slam tally, Jon Ogden |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |