>
>Rich says;
>
> >? Would you consider it bad form to state that alleged facts were
> >contradicted by the personnel dept. of the former employer?
>
>Rebuttal of facts is an accepted part of debate. To say that evidence is
>available to rebut a set of facts stated by one of the parties, and to
>produce that evidence is one thing - and is acceptable: but if one said that
>'these facts presented by Mr. X are lies and I'm going to prove it', I'd
>class that not only as unacceptable, but purposely inflammatory and
>insulting.
>
It's all in the grate debate archive. If anyone would like to RX a
one-piece searchable copy, an e-mail request to yours truly is all that's
needed. Chunks are available as well. State the area of interest, and
I'll snip the rest.
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|