>
>Rich Measures wrote:
>>
>>>neither should one publicly attack
>>>the intelligence, integrity, morals or honesty of one's opponent ...
>>
>>? Would you consider it bad form to state that alleged facts were
>>contradicted by the personnel dept. of the former employer?
>>
>Yes, it's bad form, because:
>
>(a) Your assertion - which is contradicted by several other sources -
>is based on a telephone conversation with some random person in HR who
>had no incentive to give you strictly accurate information;
>
? What is HR? // The person I spoke with was an employee in the
Varian/Eimac SLC facility's personnel office. A quite likely incentive
to give accurate information is the possiblility of job termination for
having given bad information.
>but more importantly:
>
>(b) The whole point of your pursuit of Mr Miklos seems to be to smear
>his personal integrity because his technical judgement differs from
>yours.
>
? I have seen nothing from Mr. Miklos. Tom Rauch did all of the
talking. Tom said that Miklos would show up in January, 1997 and enter
the debate. I await. If Miklos shows up, one of the first questions
from yours truly will be whether or not he agrees with Mr. Rauch's
somewhat unique method of calculating grid-dissipation by multiplying
peak grid current by rms grid-cathode volts? [sic]
>Rotten bad form, old chap... can't you see that?
? I repeated what the personnel dept. told me. Bad form would
seemingly have been to adjust what she told me. // What evidence do you
have that Miklos was other than an Engineer B at Varian/Eimac? Would
you like to have the telephone number of the SLC facility personnel
office so that you can find out first-hand, Ian?
- cheers
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|