>
>Tom Rauch wrote:
>>
>>Rich,
>>
>>Come on now, you know very well this isn't true. If you want to
>>keep a discussion non-personal, it is necessary to not fabricate
>>stories about the other party.
>>
>>Rich is referring to Buzz Michaelos, who was former R&D manager
>>at Eimac. Buzz disagreed with almost everything Rich said about
>>tubes and parasitics. Somehow Rich thinks Buzz wasn't R&D
>>manager, and feels if he impugns Buzz it makes Buzz's opinion
>>less valuable.
>>
>>Why I'm in the middle of that, is beyond me.
>>
>>> ? Surely, I waxed hot after I telephoned Eimac's personnel dept. and
>>> discovered that Mr. Rauch's allegation regarding Eimac's "R+D Engineering
>>> Manager" was a fabrication. At the onset of the grate parasitics debate,
>>> I entered into a gentlemen's agreement with Mr. Rauch. All bets were off
>>> after this discovery. . Congrats to those who warned me at the onset of
>>> the debate. Without their sage advice I would probably not have checked
>>> out the "R+D Engineering Manager" story.
>>
>>Not true Rich. Buzz was R&D manager.
>
>From the authors' personal biographies in the ARRL UHF/Microwave
>Experimenter's Handbook:
>
>"Buzz Miklos, WA4GPM... is currently [ = was, when written] the manager
>for R&D for RF cavities and tubes at."
>
? According to the personnel office's rep. at Varian/Eimac in Salt Lake
City,
Utah, Mr. Miklos was an "Engineer-B", he was not a manager, he was
well-liked, and he was no longer employed by Eimac/Varian. . My guess
is that the ARRL did not telephone the SLC personnel office to check out
Miklos' claim. . For me, a clue that something was not quite on the up
and up, was the wording of Mr. Rauch's statement. Quoting:
>"Mr. Miklos feels, and says his Eimac engineering staff felt, your theories
>have no merit and display a complete misunderstanding of how a power grid
>tube operates and the mechanisms of tube failures. "
>
>He prefers you not receive his phone number, since he understands you have
>more time to argue than he does. He will, however, call you if you always
>promise to include his views whenever you mention the person assigned to
>answer customer letters, Mr. Foote.
>
>You wanted to know who at Varian disagrees with you. You now have what you
>have asked for...and perhaps more than you wanted."
>
Not quite. It took a telephone call.
- later, Ian.
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|