>
>Dale wrote:
>
>> Well, I just have to say this. Tom, your slams are just way too
>> personal and I really don't like it. I will hang in here if you just
>> keep it to a non-personal technical disagreement.Otherwise I'm out of
>> here man.
>
>Your choice.
>As my dad used to say, "don't let the door hit you in the a** on the way
>out"
>
>> Life is just too short for that kind of crap. Makes
>> everybody feel bad.
>
>So far I've avoided any need for therapy.
>
>
>> I have kept a pretty good tally and so far Rich has my vote for being
in the lead.
>
>You seem to have a preference, that's OK, it just means you have a slant on
>this just as we all do!
>
> > I.E. - Tom you should check your
>> quiver before attempting intellectual battle.
>
>I think think Toms quiver is well stocked.
>
? Dan: Do you agree with Mr. Rauch's assertation that traditional AC
circuit-analysis is not valid for analyzing current division in a L/R
parasitic-oscillation suppressor?
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|