VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Difference between types of Rover?

To: Larissa Reise <ve3kgc@gmail.com>, VHF Contesting Reflector <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Difference between types of Rover?
From: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:56:58 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
It appears to me that Classic Rover allows only two operators at most and
can operate on any and all VHF+ bands.

Limited Rover permits only two operators using only the four lowest bands.

Unlimited Rover can use more than two operators and is exempt from these
rules:

"*3.5.3.* Rover vehicles must transport all the equipment, power supplies,
and antennas used at each operating site."
"*3.5.7. *A rover may not make more than 100 QSOs with any other one rover."


73, Zack W9SZ

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Larissa Reise <ve3kgc@gmail.com> wrote:

> Every year I like to participate in the ARRL June VHF QSO Party contest as
> a Rover. They've been loving my submissions as Unlimited Rover. Now, I can
> see the difference between Limited and Unlimited Rover categories, but why
> is there a separate category for Classic Rover? What are the differences?
> I've been back and forth through all the applicable rules and I just can't
> see much difference.
>
> 73,
> Larissa VE3KGC
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>


<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>