VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] VUCC Card Checking Question

To: "Kutzko, Sean, KX9X" <kx9x@arrl.org>, "Carl Steckler" <cjs9@cornell.edu>, <vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu>, "VHF Contesting Reflector" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] VUCC Card Checking Question
From: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Reply-to: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:45:23 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Again, I apologize. I didn't mean to stir up a hornet's nest. My only 
interest is in getting valid confirmations that will be accepted.

To be honest, this thing fails the "common sense" test. How would a card 
checker know the difference between a card that was printed by EQSL and 
mailed to me, and one that was printed and mailed to me by the station 
itself? I get cards that are created on a computer and printed on ink jet 
stock often.

As for the "cheating" element, I don't get that either. If you wanted to 
cheat on a 10ghz VUCC it would be easy. Find another ham with questionable 
honor, throw up some dishes, take a few photos, and send it the cards. Who'd 
ever know? The answer is easy... I would know. Cheating to win an award, 
contest, whatever spoils the fun. Didn't we all learn that in 1st grade. And 
besides, at the end of the day it's a piece of paper on the wall. It's worth 
nothing except to other hams...and worth less if you had to cheat to earn 
it.

I do include SASE's with all my QSL's, and yes, I make sure to let them know 
that I need their grid for VUCC. But still the return rate is low. I've 
recently gotten a QSL manager, so maybe things will improve.

In any event, I've taken up too much bandwidth already.

73 and again, thanks for the advice.

Les Rayburn, N1LF
EM63nf
121 Mayfair Park
Maylene, AL 35114



Les Rayburn, director
High Noon Film
100 Centerview Drive Suite 111
Birmingham, AL 35216-3748
205.824.8930
205.824.8960 fax
205.253.4867 cell

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Kutzko, Sean, KX9X" <kx9x@arrl.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:35 PM
To: "Carl Steckler" <cjs9@cornell.edu>; "Les Rayburn" 
<les@highnoonfilm.com>; <vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu>; "VHF  Contesting 
Reflector" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [VHF] VUCC Card Checking Question

> Gentlemen-
>
> While I am not the ARRL Awards Manager, I am an active VHF'er and monitor
> these lists. I forwarded these questions to Bill Moore, NC1L, who is ARRL
> Awards Manager. (Eileen Sapko hasn't been with ARRL in over a year).
>
>
> QSOs confirmed by eQSL are not valid for any ARRL award. If you require
> further clarification on this, you can reach Bill at bmoore@arrl.org.
>
> I continue to lobby hard for VUCC inclusion in LOTW. It will be added, but
> there are simply higher priorities on the Web Development team's long list 
> of
> things to do first.
>
> 73,
>
> Sean Kutzko KX9X
> Contest Branch Manager
> ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio
> 225 Main Street
> Newington, CT  06111 USA
> (860) 594-0232
> email: kx9x@arrl.org
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu on behalf of Carl Steckler
> Sent: Wed 1/28/2009 4:29 PM
> To: Les Rayburn; vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu; VHF  Contesting Reflector
> Subject: Re: [VHF] VUCC Card Checking Question
>
> At 03:37 PM 1/28/2009, Les Rayburn wrote:
>>Please pardon another newbie question, but here goes.
>>
>>I'm actively trying to earn VUCC on a number of bands including 6 Meters. 
>>In
>>the case of that band, operating for one year has netted me 141 grids 
>>using
> my
>>indoor antenna and 100 watts. Unfortunately, it's only need something like
> 35
>>confirmations of those QSO's. The cost of gathering them has been no small
>>affair either, with hundreds of dollars spent already on postage, 
>>envelopes,
>>QSL cards, etc.
>>
>>Yesterday, I noticed that I have perhaps another 15 or so QSO's confirmed
>>using the EQSL service. I know that currently the league does not accept
> EQSL
>>for awards credit (nor LoTW when it comes to VUCC). But I also noticed 
>>that
>>EQSL now offers a service where I can have the cards printed out and 
>>mailed
> to
>>me.
>>
>>My question is this. If I opt to have those confirmed contacts printed out
> and
>>mailed to me, would they then be acceptable for VUCC credit?
>>
>>73,
>>
>
> Les, Personally I do not see this as any different than a QSL manager
> sending out cards for those he/ she manages. I guess if you came to me 
> with
> 80 verified cards and 20 EQSL cards I would approve them. However if you
> cane to me with 80 EQSL cards and 20 verified I would tell you to go away.
> At some point there has to be a decision by ARRL on this point.
> Carl Steckler W2SGX
> VUCC / WAS Awards Manager
>
>
> "For Those who fought for it,
> Freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
> Unknown Marine, Khe Sahn, Vietnam
> Semper Fi
> Carl Steckler W2SGX
> ------
> Submissions:                    vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu
> Subscription/removal requests:  vhf-request@w6yx.stanford.edu
> Human list administrator:       vhf-approval@w6yx.stanford.edu
> List rules and information: http://www-w6yx.stanford.edu/vhf/
> ------
> Submissions:                    vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu
> Subscription/removal requests:  vhf-request@w6yx.stanford.edu
> Human list administrator:       vhf-approval@w6yx.stanford.edu
> List rules and information: http://www-w6yx.stanford.edu/vhf/
> 

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>