The problem isn’t so much resistive buildup, but rather arcing and flash-over.
The reason the right angle connectors are such a problem is that the center
conductor can either move or is bot well-placed to start with. At 100 watts it
is OK, but at 500 it may arc. This tends to be destructive to the amplifier.
Good amplifiers will protect themselves, leaving you to wonder why it just shut
down.
Similarly, coax in semi-tropical environments exposed to the sun will see
migration of the center conductor over time, changing the coax characteristics
(which a TDR should see), but ending in contact between the center conductor
and shield, which again will be problematic to the driving amplifier. I have
seen this take less than a year in South Florida.
With hamfest-variety connectors and adapters there is not much care taken in
assuring the center conductors are both well-placed and secure in their
positions. Add to that the insulators used (phenolic or something other that
Teflon) will weather and age with time, breaking down to
allow center-conductor movement.
All this is why we use really good connectors. Most of the suggestions are for
UHF family connectors, but there is junk even in type-N and BNC connectors as
companies push to lower costs to increase sales. These are easy to find,
unfortunately.
Also note that for mismatched lines, which we all use, things get far worse.
The scenario here is an ATU driving coax to a wire antenna. The ATU will make
the transmitter and amplifier happy, providing a good impedance to those
devices. But beyond the ATU you will have very high losses in everything from
the ATU components, connectors and coax. A lot of power will be dissipated in
these things, with surprisingly little being radiated from the antenna. N6BV
did some excellent work in this area, which can be found in his published
articles and the ARRL Antenna Book, which Dean edited during his time at ARRL.
His presentations show how much the components in the antenna system are
stressed.
73,
Jack, W6FB
> On Nov 25, 2023, at 12:51 PM, Scott Townley <scott@nx7u.net> wrote:
>
> If that's the case, then wouldn't an insertion loss test reveal such an issue?
>
> For example, I was deconstructing the power handling of a Charter Engineering
> B5-series coaxial relay (N-female connectors). If I map "max insertion loss
> at x GHz" to the average power rating on their published chart, at every
> point the dissipated power comes out to 11 watts. That tells me that "good"
> N-connectors can dissipate 5 watts, and for that mechanical form factor I
> should be able to derive a power limit based on measured insertion loss.
>
> Or are the physics of power handling in "not-so-good" connectors different
> from what would be revealed by an insertion loss measurement? Assuming of
> course that we are not in the realm of high voltage breakdown of the
> dielectric (or maybe that's exactly the difference?).
>
>
>
> On 24/11/2023 17:29, Jack Brindle wrote:
>> One of the big problems with off-brand connectors and adapters is their
>> power handling capabilities. This is especially noted in the right-angle
>> adapter. We see a lot of arcing when higher power is applied.
>> Higher power in this case is anything above just a few hundred watts.
>> Whenever I see an amplifier log report with a lot of high reflected power or
>> PA Dissipation faults, I immediately start looking at the
>> connectors and feed line for problems. These are usually found in one of
>> several places - right angle adapters, and baluns that were meant for low
>> power, but have been over-stressed with high
>> power.
>>
>> My advice? If the right-angle adapters aren’t Amphenol, throw them out.
>>
>> 73,
>> Jack, W6FB
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 24, 2023, at 12:59 PM, Scott Townley <scott@nx7u.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Say I have a pile of coax adapters on my bench (we all do, right?).
>>>
>>> How do I separate the wheat from the chaff? I have a fully equipped
>>> bench...I would think the go-to would be a TDR measurement. Any
>>> better/additional suggestions?
>>>
>>> TIA,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Scott NX7U
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> --
> Scott NX7U
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com <mailto:TowerTalk@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|