Jim,
FIRST - thank you so much for your excellent technical references. It
helps a lot, I highly appreciate your unparalleled performance.
SECOND - am I allowed to differ between a QSO between living operators
(possibly friends) and two machines?
If yes, allow me, please keep the difference forever. In a competition
(DXCC, WAZ, counties etc.), modes with engaged human brain and senses
should be kept separately from the modes where the brain and senses are
NOT (or are minimally) engaged. Am I asking for too much?
I am NOT biased against any mode. Do you like it? Do it! Do you count
this as old dog's new trick? Well, do it, go ahead! BTW there are more
old dogs, some of them are happy to do old tricks, in the same way as
they did 50 years ago. As Vern Kaspar, W9FAM did! They still going
strong, some of them unfortunately only in my mind, in my memories...
Unfortunately I MUST be biased against no-code guys who spreads out with
pride to have 300 countries and actually they have 150 on SSB and 150 on
FT8. I would ask them to say honestly that they have X on SSB and Y on
FT8 and no-code. I would appreciate such honest guy, he would deserve my
highest respect.
What I am doing wrong?
73,
sincerely
Martin, OK1RR
Dne 09. 03. 21 v 20:41 Jim Brown napsal(a):
On 3/9/2021 6:36 AM, Martin Kratoska wrote:
Oh, FT8 should be proclaimed as illegal for DXCC (WAZ, WAS etc.) in
mixed categories.
This "mode" should be counted completely separated from traditional
modes like CW or SSB.
Why? I'm a VERY old dog who can still copy CW in my sleep, but who is
still trying to learn new tricks every day. And K1JT's modes are new
tricks that allow us to defeat the RF noise that is killing weak
signal work for all of us, whether we realize it or not.
73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|