Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FCP versus loaded or "T" radialsradials

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: FCP versus loaded or "T" radialsradials
From: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 11:15:57 -0700
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I'm with Tom.  I probably have one of the more challenging situations around for installing on-the-ground radials in my cactus patch.  (See my QRZ page for a hint)  Nevertheless, after studying the available literature, particularly Rudy Severns', I opted for them.  I need more, but currently I have eighteen 55' long insulated, on the ground, radials (1000' of 14 AWG).  The Inverted L is 55' vertical, the rest horizontal.  By serendipity, the radials are resonant at about 1850 kHz.

Wes N7WS


On 5/4/2019 9:14 AM, N4ZR wrote:
At the risk of setting off a food-fight, I'm interested in opinions on shortened radials (T or loaded) versus the K2AC/W0UCE folded counterpoise design.  W8JI has an interesting unfinished page <www.w8ji.com/fcp_folded_counterpoise_system.htm> attacking the FCP.  Tom's a combative fella, but he's also very smart.  I am putting up an inverted L, trying to avoid having to lay down 6000 or even 750 feet of on-the ground radials, and don't really have room for resonant elevated radials on 160.


_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>