Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

To: "'Lloyd - N9LB'" <lloydberg@charter.net>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary
From: David Cutter via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: David Cutter <d.cutter@ntlworld.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 09:05:00 -0000
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
It's the shared receive-only site that I will build for my club.  I can't
think of a better application of subs for members who live in high density
housing as we do.  LF is now completely out of the question for all but a
privileged few.
David G3UNA/G6CP

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Lloyd -
N9LB
Sent: 23 November 2018 22:49
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

A shared Receive Only site can be used by many operators simultaneously.  
However a shared RX-TX site (remote station) would be impossible.
( Think Bouvet on 20m CW, listening up 1-10 )

Also a club sponsored shared RX could be set up far from any noise sources,
run on solar cells & batteries, with an 802.11A Wi-FI link back to the
nearest wired Internet.

73

Lloyd - N9LB


_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>