Hi Herb et al,
In Europe Kosovo is considered to be an autonom and independent unit. In
fact both the EU and NATO did bring the forces necessary to bring the war
to an end. Why, you might ask after all this suffering, is that this nation
still is not recognazid as a separate entity to this very small world of the
global assembly that Ham radio really is?
Len
SM7BIC
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] För Herb Schoenbohm
Skickat: den 18 november 2013 15:30
Till: topband@contesting.com
Ämne: Topband: DXCC Desk?
What is the "DXCC Desk" anyway? It used to be just Bob White W1CW seated at
a real oak desk with stacks of cards and papers and Bob's omnipresent huge
Sherlock Holmes handy magnifying glass to look for any alterations. Today I
understand the "DXCC Desk" is no longer a desk at all but is comprised of
computers, LOTW servers, and a DXCC Committee, which is "tasked" by another
Committee made up primarily by HQ employees and answer, perhaps, to the ARRL
Board of Directors. I think the organization flow chart may even be a
mystery inside of an enigma.
Perhaps a Kafkaesque relic from some other place. That's how they like
it. Now new countries are created and approved for political purposes and
real ones are refused for political purposes, like Kosovo and
Chechnya. Maybe instead of referring to it as the "DXCC Desk" perhaps
the "DXCC Regime" would be more appropriate.
Mis dos centavos
Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
On 11/18/2013 9:12 AM, James Rodenkirch wrote:
> Sheesh, Carl!! I doubt if the ARRL desk is gonna, or even should, weigh
in on something they'd have no control over OR would have even an inkling of
what went on to cause them to question it!
> First off, last time I looked, the QSL sent and received is between the
sender, in this case me, and the receiver/replyee, the DX bubba AND, most
importantly, is based on the notion that both are telling the truth!!!! How
in the hell would/could the DXCC question that??? They gonna think we both
are lying???
> NOW, in the case of suspected "cheating" - me submitting a QSL card,
> as part of my DXCC 160 package submission for a QSO on 160 between K9JWV
and PT0S at 1700Z on any day of the year - I could see them saying "Prove
it"! Hi Hi I am FASCINATED by your mention of a "Prove it, Dood" via
requesting an audio tape of a QSO for validation!! Wow!!
> 72, Jim R. K9JWV
>
>> From: km1h@jeremy.mv.com
>> To: rodenkirch_llc@msn.com; bernie@dailydx.com
>> CC: ve5ra@sasktel.net; topband@contesting.com; herbs@vitelcom.net
>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4 and
after!
>> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 20:03:05 -0500
>>
>> I would think that the ultimate decision is up to the ARRL DXCC desk.
>> In the past if it wasnt in the log it didnt count....period...no
>> matter who was before or after. Expecting an operator to remember a
>> mistake months later...or his QSL manager....is a stretch.
>>
>> This brought about many decades ago of making a tape copy (that shows
>> its
>> age) whenever a new one was worked and a few times having to present
>> it to the DXCC desk to obtain credit.
>>
>> Im not saying you both didnt do a full legitimate exchange, dont get
>> me wrong there.
>>
>> Perhaps someone from the DXCC desk can weigh in.
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>> ---- Original Message -----
>> From: "James Rodenkirch" <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
>> To: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR" <bernie@dailydx.com>; "KM1H Carl"
>> <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
>> Cc: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; "Top Band Contesting"
>> <topband@contesting.com>; "KV4FZ Herb" <herbs@vitelcom.net>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 6:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4 and
after!
>>
>>
>> As Bernie says, "Mistakes happen."
>> Just to re-iterate --- they DID copy my call correctly!! I heard them
>> come back to me with K9JWV 599! THAT's why I put in the log.
>> I wouldn't have logged the QSO if he came back "K9JJV 599"!!! I'd
>> still be there calling them!! Hi HiI'm ok with the notion it's not a
>> valid QSO IF they got my call wrong in the exchange, which they
>> didn't! Them mucking up my call entry in the log is a different matter.
>> 72, Jim R. K9JWV
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: bernie@dailydx.com
>>> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:29:18 -0500
>>> To: zr@jeremy.mv.com
>>> CC: herbs@vitelcom.net; topband@contesting.com; ve5ra@sasktel.net
>>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4 and
>>> after!
>>>
>>> Like I said - mistakes happen. If the guy who made the mistake
>>> realizes he did so and is will to correct the error that is nothing
>>> wrong with that.
>>> Bernie
>>>
>>> Bernie McClenny, W3UR
>>> Editor of The Daily DX, The Weekly DX and How's DX?
>>> Two week trial - http://www.dailydx.com/trial.htm
>>> https://twitter.com/dailydx
>>> 410-489-6518
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2013, at 8:46 AM, ZR <zr@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ive always been under the impression that both calls have to be
>>>> sent, received, and verified to count for DXCC and other awards.
>>>> QSO's on 160 are no different than EME when it comes to verification.
>>>> Unless an audio recording (SSB/CW) is kept to verify a mistake was
>>>> made in the log the result is still a busted call which also gets
>>>> deleted during contest log checking.
>>>>
>>>> Am I wrong here?
>>>>
>>>> Carl
>>>> KM1H
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR"
>>>> <bernie@dailydx.com>
>>>> To: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
>>>> Cc: "Topband reflector" <topband@contesting.com>; "KV4FZ Herb"
>>>> <herbs@vitelcom.net>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 6:08 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4
>>>> and after!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ugh - Let me go on the record as saying I don?t like this idea and
>>>> I wish this can of worms was not opened! Thankfully US stations
>>>> (and hopefully others) no longer have second (personal) calls. Yes
>>>> we have club calls, but thankfully those QSOs will not count for
>>>> ones personal DXCC records. I?ve been on DXpeditions and had guys
>>>> download all their calls on me (on each band and band mode!),
>>>> taking away the opportunity for other Deserving DXers to get into
>>>> the log. Yes I realize sometimes the DXpedition or DX operator
>>>> makes a mistake and I have been burned once or twice over the
>>>> years, not at the fault of my own but by the other guy in the QSO.
>>>> I much prefer K9JWV?s method by noting in my log the previous or next
QSO.
>>>>
>>>> Flame retardant suit on!
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> Bernie
>>>>
>>>> Bernie McClenny, W3UR
>>>>
>>> _________________
>>> Topband Reflector
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3222/6344 - Release Date:
>> 11/17/13
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James Rodenkirch" <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
>> To: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR" <bernie@dailydx.com>; "KM1H Carl"
>> <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
>> Cc: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; "Top Band Contesting"
>> <topband@contesting.com>; "KV4FZ Herb" <herbs@vitelcom.net>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 6:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4 and
after!
>>
>>
>> As Bernie says, "Mistakes happen."
>> Just to re-iterate --- they DID copy my call correctly!! I heard them
>> come back to me with K9JWV 599! THAT's why I put in the log.
>> I wouldn't have logged the QSO if he came back "K9JJV 599"!!! I'd
>> still be there calling them!! Hi HiI'm ok with the notion it's not a
>> valid QSO IF they got my call wrong in the exchange, which they
>> didn't! Them mucking up my call entry in the log is a different matter.
>> 72, Jim R. K9JWV
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: bernie@dailydx.com
>>> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:29:18 -0500
>>> To: zr@jeremy.mv.com
>>> CC: herbs@vitelcom.net; topband@contesting.com; ve5ra@sasktel.net
>>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4 and
>>> after!
>>>
>>> Like I said - mistakes happen. If the guy who made the mistake
>>> realizes he did so and is will to correct the error that is nothing
>>> wrong with that.
>>> Bernie
>>>
>>> Bernie McClenny, W3UR
>>> Editor of The Daily DX, The Weekly DX and How's DX?
>>> Two week trial - http://www.dailydx.com/trial.htm
>>> https://twitter.com/dailydx
>>> 410-489-6518
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2013, at 8:46 AM, ZR <zr@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ive always been under the impression that both calls have to be
>>>> sent, received, and verified to count for DXCC and other awards.
>>>> QSO's on 160 are no different than EME when it comes to verification.
>>>> Unless an audio recording (SSB/CW) is kept to verify a mistake was
>>>> made in the log the result is still a busted call which also gets
>>>> deleted during contest log checking.
>>>>
>>>> Am I wrong here?
>>>>
>>>> Carl
>>>> KM1H
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR"
>>>> <bernie@dailydx.com>
>>>> To: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
>>>> Cc: "Topband reflector" <topband@contesting.com>; "KV4FZ Herb"
>>>> <herbs@vitelcom.net>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 6:08 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4
>>>> and after!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ugh - Let me go on the record as saying I don?t like this idea and
>>>> I wish this can of worms was not opened! Thankfully US stations
>>>> (and hopefully others) no longer have second (personal) calls. Yes
>>>> we have club calls, but thankfully those QSOs will not count for
>>>> ones personal DXCC records. I?ve been on DXpeditions and had guys
>>>> download all their calls on me (on each band and band mode!),
>>>> taking away the opportunity for other Deserving DXers to get into
>>>> the log. Yes I realize sometimes the DXpedition or DX operator
>>>> makes a mistake and I have been burned once or twice over the
>>>> years, not at the fault of my own but by the other guy in the QSO.
>>>> I much prefer K9JWV?s method by noting in my log the previous or next
QSO.
>>>>
>>>> Flame retardant suit on!
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> Bernie
>>>>
>>>> Bernie McClenny, W3UR
>>>>
>>> _________________
>>> Topband Reflector
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3222/6344 - Release Date:
>> 11/17/13
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James Rodenkirch" <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
>> To: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR" <bernie@dailydx.com>; "KM1H Carl"
>> <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
>> Cc: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; "Top Band Contesting"
>> <topband@contesting.com>; "KV4FZ Herb" <herbs@vitelcom.net>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 6:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4 and
after!
>>
>>
>> As Bernie says, "Mistakes happen."
>> Just to re-iterate --- they DID copy my call correctly!! I heard them
>> come back to me with K9JWV 599! THAT's why I put in the log.
>> I wouldn't have logged the QSO if he came back "K9JJV 599"!!! I'd
>> still be there calling them!! Hi HiI'm ok with the notion it's not a
>> valid QSO IF they got my call wrong in the exchange, which they
>> didn't! Them mucking up my call entry in the log is a different matter.
>> 72, Jim R. K9JWV
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: bernie@dailydx.com
>>> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:29:18 -0500
>>> To: zr@jeremy.mv.com
>>> CC: herbs@vitelcom.net; topband@contesting.com; ve5ra@sasktel.net
>>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4 and
>>> after!
>>>
>>> Like I said - mistakes happen. If the guy who made the mistake
>>> realizes he did so and is will to correct the error that is nothing
>>> wrong with that.
>>> Bernie
>>>
>>> Bernie McClenny, W3UR
>>> Editor of The Daily DX, The Weekly DX and How's DX?
>>> Two week trial - http://www.dailydx.com/trial.htm
>>> https://twitter.com/dailydx
>>> 410-489-6518
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2013, at 8:46 AM, ZR <zr@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ive always been under the impression that both calls have to be
>>>> sent, received, and verified to count for DXCC and other awards.
>>>> QSO's on 160 are no different than EME when it comes to verification.
>>>> Unless an audio recording (SSB/CW) is kept to verify a mistake was
>>>> made in the log the result is still a busted call which also gets
>>>> deleted during contest log checking.
>>>>
>>>> Am I wrong here?
>>>>
>>>> Carl
>>>> KM1H
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR"
>>>> <bernie@dailydx.com>
>>>> To: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
>>>> Cc: "Topband reflector" <topband@contesting.com>; "KV4FZ Herb"
>>>> <herbs@vitelcom.net>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 6:08 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4
>>>> and after!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ugh - Let me go on the record as saying I don?t like this idea and
>>>> I wish this can of worms was not opened! Thankfully US stations
>>>> (and hopefully others) no longer have second (personal) calls. Yes
>>>> we have club calls, but thankfully those QSOs will not count for
>>>> ones personal DXCC records. I?ve been on DXpeditions and had guys
>>>> download all their calls on me (on each band and band mode!),
>>>> taking away the opportunity for other Deserving DXers to get into
>>>> the log. Yes I realize sometimes the DXpedition or DX operator
>>>> makes a mistake and I have been burned once or twice over the
>>>> years, not at the fault of my own but by the other guy in the QSO.
>>>> I much prefer K9JWV?s method by noting in my log the previous or next
QSO.
>>>>
>>>> Flame retardant suit on!
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> Bernie
>>>>
>>>> Bernie McClenny, W3UR
>>>>
>>> _________________
>>> Topband Reflector
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3222/6344 - Release Date:
>> 11/17/13
>>
>>
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
_________________
Topband Reflector
_________________
Topband Reflector
|