Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Technology "QSO's"

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Technology "QSO's"
From: "Jerry Keller - K3BZ" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:13:53 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
In his excellent book "The Complete DXer", no less an authority than Bob Locher 
W9KNI tells of 
getting phone calls from friends alerting him to new ones, giving him callsigns 
and frequencies. Bob 
cites his own use of spotting networks, if only to see if the crowd has found 
the DX yet. So to me 
spotting networks are an acceptable DXing tool. Can they be abused? Probably... 
it seems anything 
can be abused these days.  Spotting networks are nothing more than the logical 
evolution of the 
postcard sked and the local 2M DX net.  Technology marches on... these are no 
longer the dark ages. 
But that has only to do with sharing where to listen (or look) for the DX. 
There's a world of 
difference between a tip as to where to point the beam and direct parallel 
hardline communication 
that sets up and confirms every aspect of the QSO. Abuse is often just a matter 
of degree, and 
knowing where to draw the line.  Will everyone agree on where the ethical line 
must be drawn?  Not 
likely. But the standards and examples set by the giants of DXing... like 
W9KNI... are good enough 
for me, and those standards apply no matter what band I'm on.

Just my 2 cents... 73,  Jerry K3BZ 


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>