RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules

To: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>, Tom Moore <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>,rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:16:20 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
At 05:48 PM 12/17/2005, Barry wrote:

>Tom (et al),
>This issue has been beaten to death many times before.  Go back to
>scores from the pre-SO2R days.  The same people that win contests today
>won them back them, too.  The top operators always strive to do better.
>Why go to the trouble of SO2R?  Because it's one more way to enhance the
>contesting experience.  I get just as much, if not more, satisfaction
>knowing the SO2R station I built (about 50% homebrew stuff) performs
>well, compared to doing well in contests.
>73,
>Barry W2UP

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Beaten, but far from dead.

Nobody is against SO2R, only against combining SO2R and SO1R scores 
together. 2R is a huge advantage comparable to going from LP To HP or 
from SO to MO and should be classed separately.

As simple as that.

73, Bill W6WRT

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>