Tom (et al),
This issue has been beaten to death many times before. Go back to
scores from the pre-SO2R days. The same people that win contests today
won them back them, too. The top operators always strive to do better.
Why go to the trouble of SO2R? Because it's one more way to enhance the
contesting experience. I get just as much, if not more, satisfaction
knowing the SO2R station I built (about 50% homebrew stuff) performs
well, compared to doing well in contests.
73,
Barry W2UP
Tom Moore wrote:
>
>you see. that's what I mean. That's BS. For the last several years, the
>scores of SO2R ops CLEARLY beat SO1R scores ROUTINELY!! sometimes by as much
>as 1/4! If they didn't why would they go to the trouble of doing SO2R!
>SO2R is, at minimum, an equal or higher advantage than being in the HIGH
>POWER category. You may disagree, but the SCORES show otherwise! Everybody
>knows this. Every SO2R op I know has admitted he could not equal his SO2R
>score by being SO1R. For the life of me, I can't understand why contest
>sponsors refuse to acknowledge this clear fact.
>
>Tom WX4TM
>
>
>
>
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP
Newtown, PA
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|