On 12/18/05, Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I think the ARRL *should* repeat the pages in
> every set of rules. Having to jump back and forth is silly and worse,
> confusing. What is their purpose? Saving electrons?
On the electronic version, certainly they should publish the whole
thing. I can understand it for the paper version, though they need to
publish them in full at least once per year. The QST editors have
been known to refer to rules or guidelines that were published nearly
10 years ago.
--
Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train!
"They that can give up essential Liberty to
obtain a little temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|