On Dec 18, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Bill Turner wrote:
> I agree with all you say, but you still don't explain why 1R and 2R
> scores should be classed together. That's my only issue. I'm all in
> favor of 2R (or more) operation, just not together with 1R.
Because it is ONE operator. The key element, the centerpiece and the
weak link in the chain is the operator.
(Just try to write a rule to separate these hypothetical "classes".
How do you define 2R? If I have a box like a Ten-Tec Orion, is that
one radio or two? What if I modified so it could receive on one side
while transmitting? What if like W6AM I build transmitters and
receivers for each amateur band - am I suddenly SO5R? What I if I
have one transmitter with instant band change and two receivers?)
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|