RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] New ARRL Mission statement > Was solar fix

To: Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] New ARRL Mission statement > Was solar fix
From: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:15:32 +0000
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
I well remember when, in EE Times, the merits of the (then brand new)
switch mode power conversion units was covered in a number of issues.
Efficiency over the linear supplies was the golden egg.  They were touted
as the best thing since sliced bread for efficient power conversion.

Fast forward a year or so.  Same publication.  Now EE Times was covering
the RFI caused by their newest baby, switch mode power conversion units.
It was major.  Then another 6 or so months, all kinds of articles on how to
tame the RFI from SWPSs.

Something similar needs to occur with the present mess associated with wall
warts and, in general, even more switch mode power conversion units.

Dave - WØLEV
Retired EMC/RFI Engineer
EMC Design & Test, LLC

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 5:12 PM Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com> wrote:

> In all of this, I see a BIT of good news. I read things like EDN and other
> trade rags. One of the recurring topics for the last 2 years or so has been
> design to prevent EMI/RFI, particularly on the power supply end.
> The chip designers, editors etc are pointing out it is an issue. Now the
> question is, are the downstream designers taking heed? Don’t know
> --
> 73 de KG2V
> Charlie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>


-- 

*Dave - WØLEV*
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>