Yes, we only remove the offender's QSO, NOT both. We don't expect ops to
adjudicate OOB QSOs in real-time on the receiving side.
73, John, K1AR
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 9:26 PM Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your response, Doug. Your infrequent posting gives you a high
> signal to noise ratio. Not bad for a QRP guy :-)
> However, you didn't fully answer my question - Is the OOB QSO removed from
> both logs or just the OOB offender?
>
> Barry W2UP
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 5:34 PM JP <jp@ezoom.net> wrote:
>
> > Exactly. Thanks Doug. It’s about integrity and accountability.
> >
> > J.P. W2XX/KP4
> >
> > > On Oct 27, 2025, at 3:20 PM, Douglas Zwiebel <dougzzz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Gosh...
> > >
> > > I rarely comment here, but.....
> > >
> > > Before you complain about "does anybody check," how about reading the
> > > yearly results. There are guys dinged and DQ'ed every year for OOB
> > > operations. That includes Advanced and General calls who are OOB.
> > >
> > > One year, the "winner" for his category got DQ'ed for OOB.
> > >
> > > Yes..it is checked. DUH !!!!
> > >
> > > de Doug KR2Q
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|