CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Tower safety

To: "w1ve@yccc.org" <w1ve@yccc.org>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Tower safety
From: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:44:21 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I have not heard the exact circumstances of W0AIH’s accident.  What was quickly 
published was his fall arrest system failed.  He was clearly using a harness.  
If some has the details, I think we would all benefit from learning.

Even with proper temporary guying, I would not climb a tower to take it down 
that had the base legs rusted through at the concrete point.

We would really benefit from the equivalent of NASA’s pilot reporting system 
where the details of events and “near events” are publicized for us all to 
learn.

I for one, like many tower climbers that I have observed, do a hybrid of free 
climb and clipped in.  Free climb to the first set of guys is pretty common for 
many of us.  Clipping in as we gain height.  90% of the time clipped in while 
climbing.  100% doing work.  Full body harness?  Not really.  But haven’t used 
a lineman’s belt since being a teenager.

Is it perfect?  No. But if I am tired. I don’t climb.  And the above is pretty 
darned safe when done with good judgment.  A full body harness and 
carelessness, or understanding of physical strength, is not “safe” just because.

Ed  N1UR

From: Gerry Hull [mailto:gerry@yccc.org]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 4:14 PM
To: Edward Sawyer
Cc: rjairam@gmail.com; James Cain; CQ-Contest Reflector
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Tower safety

Ed,

I think you are applying your analysis from the wrong perspective.

In the W0AIH case, if Paul had been 100% attached to the tower, his winch cable 
could have failed and he would have survived (this craziest) winching approach.

In our local case, the tower base failure as a root cause is a red herring:  It 
may have contributed.  However, it was a process error.   No one should 
consider taking down a tower that was up for ANY length of time without first 
fully inspecting the tower, the guying system, etc.   Had these unfortunate 
gentlemen taken any time to survey and understand what they were getting into, 
I believe this incident may have been avoided.

As K8MR points out, it does not matter how many 1000s of hours of experience 
you have, or how much of a bodybuilder you are.   All it takes is 1 second of 
distraction to end your life.

73, Gerry W1VE


On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 8:16 AM Edward Sawyer 
<EdwardS@sbelectronics.com<mailto:EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>> wrote:
I think that issue is that the discussion Jim had did not get to the true root 
cause analysis in all cases.  HE did speak about temporary guying below the 
work on  a tower and doing the "off the tower" movement of guys which clearly 
was a root cause of more than one known tower incident.

I believe that a rusted base at the concrete exit point was a root cause and I 
am not sure I heard that mentioned.

W0AIH's fatality was in no way due to not using the proper safety harness.  
There are pictures of him using one.  I am not sure what failed in his arrest 
system.  But wearing the wrong harness is not what it was.

To be truthful to the root cause analysis process, of which I do a lot if it at 
work, is there documented fatalities of wearing the lesser harness than what 
Jim was showing on the video?  If so, what happened, and how would it be 
mitigated by that ewquipment?

If we REALLY want to improve safety, we should focus on what's killing people.  
Not on what isn't killing people.

Some of that occurred on Jim's talk.  Some of it did not.  And some of it is 
great advice but may have no direct impact on reducing what's killing people.

Ed  N1UR

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest 
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com>]
 On Behalf Of rjairam@gmail.com<mailto:rjairam@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 7:19 PM
To: James Cain
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Tower safety

You got lucky.

I prefer not to rely on luck, and it doesn’t take much time to get properly 
suited up at all.

As for replacing the climbing apparatus, I wouldn’t trust it if it arrested a 
serious fall. Stress on that kind of apparatus is cumulative so there may be 
hidden danger.

This is your life you’re gambling with and by all means I won’t tell you how to 
live it, but I prefer not to roll the dice.

Ria
N2RJ

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:22 PM James Cain 
<jamesdavidcain@gmail.com<mailto:jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>> wrote:

> I did pretty serious tower work for more than 20 years and quit at age 44.
> By the time I had got suited up in that equipment in the K1IR video it
> would have been too dark to get any work done. And what's this about
> "If you fall, (the manufacturer says) to throw away the climbing apparatus"?
> And what? Buy another climbing apparatus from us?
>
> K1TN
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>