| To: | <k3bu@optimum.net>, <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading" |
| From: | "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de> |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:00:31 +0200 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Beside all that is correct higher efficient mobile antennes on the low bands are those with base loading by high Q coils. 73 Peter -----Original Message----- From: topband-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of k3bu@optimum.net Linear loading is less efficient than coil, base loading worst, top loading is the best, loading coil about 2/3 up is a good compromise especially for mobile antennas. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Weatherproof enclosures?, ZR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: weather proof enclosures, jacobsen_5 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading", k3bu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading", Mike Waters |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |