To: | "Stein Roar Brobakken" <s-roabr@online.no>, <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading" |
From: | "Lars Harlin" <lars.harlin@one.se> |
Date: | Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:42:07 +0200 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Hi Rag! Have you thought about the possibility to use linear loading? That could be a good alternative when you cant put the loading on top... 73 de Lars, SM3BDZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stein Roar Brobakken" <s-roabr@online.no> To: <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:11 PM Subject: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading" > Hi > > We are going to install a 18m spiderbeam @ LA9TJA for use for 160m > > We been studying different top loading configurations, but we can't have > the > wires stringed from the top because it will break the spiderbeam ;) > _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Spurs, Roger D Johnson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading", Lup Schlueter |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading", Stein Roar Brobakken |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m vertical with "top loading", Jan Erik Holm |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |