Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"

["Larry W8ER" <larry@w8er.com>]

Ron .. I'd really love to get into this but the TenTec Reflector isn't the 
place. I have been wondering the same thing myself though. Like why have 
they consistently favored "dumming down" the hobby? To get more members 
maybe $$$? Is "dumming down" the hobby good for it?
--Larry w8er


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <roncasa@verizon.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Cc: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"


> On Thursday 14 April 2005 08:54 am, Tommy wrote:
> > Me also! You know if they are trying to regulate by bandwidth, they have
> > something up there sleeve that probably is not going to be good for the
> > hobby!
> Well there is a statement that does not make sense, or is not logical.
> Logic dictates (or common sense reveals):
> ARRL presence is dependant on the hobby of ham radio.
> Why would "they" be planning something thats "not good for the hobby"?
>
> Ron wb1hga
> "CW, an esoteric experience"
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec