TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"
From: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com>
Reply-to: gsm@mendelson.com,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:50:34 +0300
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:33:35AM -0400, roncasa@verizon.net wrote:
>  
> Well there is a statement that does not make sense, or is not logical.
> Logic dictates (or common sense reveals):
> ARRL presence is dependant on the hobby of ham radio.
> Why would "they" be planning something thats "not good for the hobby"?

They are dependent upon hams that pay membership dues. 

The problem is as I said before, the 80 (no 75 at all) and 40 meter bands
are much smaller outside of the America's. The voice portion of the US
bands is impossible to hear because it is used by high power broadcasters.

This limits the ability of hams outside of the America's to have a reasonable
conversation and now that long distance is cheap and there are internet phones,
what's left are the most dedicated. Phone patches are gone.

The solution is ...........

Geoff.


-- 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel gsm@mendelson.com  N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: 972-2-679-6896  IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 
VoN  Skype: mendelsonfamily
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>