| To: | "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:51:54 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Martin, AA6E wrote: Oops...I guess I did not read the text carefully enough, and made the completely rediculous assumption that the pictorial chart representations would be complete and accurate.AM forever! - read the article: "The EC made no change to its earlier recommendation that the rules continue to permit double-sideband, full-carrier AM and independent sideband (ISB) as specific exceptions to the 3 kHz bandwidth limit--with restrictions of 9 kHz and 6 kHz respectively. DE N6KB |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Real CW, Alfred Lorona |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Real CW, jerome schatten |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth", Martin, AA6E |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth", Ira Franklin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |