| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" |
| From: | "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:08:12 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 4/14/05, Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net> wrote: > Me also! You know if they are trying to regulate by bandwidth, they have > something up there sleeve that probably is not going to be good for the > hobby! > > Tommy > > W4BQF It's been said before, but the ARRL is all we've got. They are hard-working and well-meaning, even if they don't measure up to some folks' wishes. If there's another organization that's doing a better job, I haven't heard about it. Sorry to add to this off-topic stuff. We might all have a better day if we just let the Tentec reflector be a Tentec reflector. 73, Martin --- martin.ewing@gmail.com http://blog.aa6e.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] corsair, Chuck Frame |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth", Larry W8ER |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth", Larry W8ER |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth", David S.McCallum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |