CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] new scores in standings

To: Terry Zivney <n4tz@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] new scores in standings
From: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 07:51:22 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Terry,

That's just a bad "rule" in my opinion.  What could be the purpose of listing 
an invalid entry in the results? 

I guess it could be to show whoever got the big award that he really didn't win 
except for the fact someone else missed the deadline by at least a minute.

You either submit the log by the deadline or it will be used and listed as a 
check log if you choose to submit it late - in my opinion.  Wanting to use 
these logs to adjudicate the contest does not mean they need to be listed in 
the results.

Stan, K5GO

Sent from Stan's IPhone



> On Oct 4, 2015, at 7:28 PM, Terry Zivney <n4tz@arrl.net> wrote:
> 
> The rules of the CQ WPX Contest state clearly that "C. Logs submitted or 
> postmarked after the deadline may be listed in the results, but are not 
> eligible for awards."
> This means not eligible for first place, second place, or last placeawards.  
> (The online certificate generator for CQ WPX will printcertificates for all 
> places for valid entrees.)  Once upon a time,when logs were received after 
> the deadline, their scores were not reported at all.  The CQ WPX Contest (and 
> also, I believe) the CQ WW Contest want to use all possible means to 
> adjudicate the contest. That means we want everyone's log, even those that 
> choose not to meet allthe rules of the contest.  We even provide feedback to 
> everyonewho sends in a log by scoring the log and provided Log 
> CheckingReports for each log so that operators can improve their 
> performancein the future.
> The Raw scores or Claimed scores are just that: scores that havenot been 
> checked to determine what their final scores would be.   
> The log deadline was announced months before the CQ WPX contest.  Norules 
> were changed after the contest.    
> Terry Zivney, N4TZCQ WPX Contest Director 
> 
> 
>     On Sunday, October 4, 2015 6:58 PM, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest 
> <cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> The way I look at this, other than the WRTC2018 event itself, WRTC does not 
> assign points on its own. That is, they depend on other contest organizers, 
> such as WPX, to assign points and determine if participants have followed the 
> rules.
> 
> In your case, WRTC has overruled WPX, even though WRTC has no authority over 
> WPX. Sure, WRTC can maintain their current position on many valid concerns- 
> "Our way or the highway"- but is indeed unfair.
> 
> I have no horse in this game. As an observer, I have the feeling WRTC forgets 
> that the event is all about the competitors, not the organizers.  There have 
> been quite a few thoughtful comments from well respected competitors whose 
> feedback has been met with "These are our rules, they are set in stone, and 
> too bad if you don't like them".
> 
> Rudy N2WQ
> 
> Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate 
> autocorrect.
> 
> 
>> On Oct 4, 2015, at 4:47 PM, Ashraf Chaabane <ash.kf5eyy@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, and I don't think this is fair!
>> 
>> 73
>> 
>> Ash 3V8BB/KF5EYY
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 04 Oct 2015, at 21:35, Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ash,
>>> 
>>> Are you saying that WPX accepted and published your score, but WRTC chose 
>>> to not accept it?
>>> 
>>> Rudy N2WQ
>>> 
>>> Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate 
>>> autocorrect.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:51 PM, Ashraf CHAABANE <ash.kf5eyy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear Ulf,
>>>> 
>>>> This rule of removing WRTC points for 'late log' was added recently. I 
>>>> can't
>>>> see if this is a good practice to update rules while qualification race is
>>>> ongoing.
>>>> 
>>>> I sent my log few hours after the deadline, HOWEVER: I'm compliant with WPX
>>>> rules, my log is valid, my QSOs are confirmed, my score is listed (was not
>>>> re-classified as a Checklog!). I simply won't receive a paper certificate.
>>>> This is very disappointing that I'm punished two times. 
>>>> 
>>>> Personally, I do 260 km to operate every contest and a lot of arrangements
>>>> are made to free up time. Then I see zero WRTC points.
>>>> 
>>>> By the way, Africa is split in two separate areas however one TL will be
>>>> selected. That means, a competitor from South West Africa can have ALL WRTC
>>>> points each contest with only few QSOs made and get qualified, while those
>>>> in North Africa where competition is hot will stay home.
>>>> I didn't comment on that previously, I understood that rules are made and I
>>>> should respect them. But please consider re-visiting this new rule of "late
>>>> log".
>>>> 
>>>> Appreciate the efforts you are doing to make WRTC2018 a successful event!
>>>> 
>>>> vy73
>>>> --
>>>> Ash KF5EYY
>>>> Op. 3V8SS, 3V8BB
>>>> www.kf5eyy.info
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> Message: 2
>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 22:36:38 +0200
>>>> From: "DL5AXX, WRTC2018" <dl5axx@wrtc2018.de>
>>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com, rrdxa@mailman.qth.net,
>>>>   bcc@bavarian-contest-club.de, wrtc2018@lists.wrtc2018.de
>>>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] new scores in standings
>>>> Message-ID: <560D9956.2000109@wrtc2018.de>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>>>> 
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> 
>>>> even added WAE SSB claimed and RDXC finals. Points for 'late logs' from the
>>>> CQ WPX SSB are removed (see FAQ -
>>>> http://www.wrtc2018.de/index.php/en/wettbewerb-2).
>>>> 
>>>> Current standings at
>>>> http://www.wrtc2018.de/index.php/en/wettbewerb-2/standings-2
>>>> 
>>>> 73 Ulf, DL5AXX
>>>> WRTC2018 qualifications
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 154, Issue 2
>>>> ******************************************
>>>> -----
>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>> Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4419/10708 - Release Date: 09/27/15
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>