CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: new scores in standings

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>, <n4tz@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: new scores in standings
From: "V. Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:27:18 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Terry,

Don't you think that any reference to awards is misleading in this respect? 
Wouldn't it be better to make it explicitly clear: Logs submitted or postmarked 
after the deadline may be listed in the results, but for reference only, and 
respective entries will not be considered as taking part in the competition."

Or in other words, if you build a rule regarding conditions of provision of 
awards, either paper or PDF ones, it's OK. But if you want to cut late logs off 
the competition completely, why awards are even mentioned?

73,

Vlad VE3IAE

--

 


 
Subject:    Re: [CQ-Contest] new scores in standings
From: Terry Zivney <n4tz@arrl.net>
Reply-to:   Terry Zivney <n4tz@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 00:28:54 +0000 (UTC)
 
 
The rules of the CQ WPX Contest state clearly that "C. Logs submitted or 
postmarked after the deadline may be listed in the results, but are not 
eligible for awards."
This means not eligible for first place, second place, or last place awards.
 
Terry Zivney, N4TZ CQ WPX Contest Director
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>