>
> If you consider CW to be something special, a mode that
> is intended to be decoded by ear (the one thing which
> sets it apart from all "other" data modes), then that's
> how you do it - all by yourself.
>
> Otherwise, you're a machine operator, not a CW operator.
>
> The use of code readers, including Skimmer, is
> incompatible with unassisted CW entries.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
Paul,
You have captured the essence of the argument perfectly in those words.
Thank you!
73, de Hans, K0HB
Just a boy and his radio
--
><{{{{*> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0h
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|