To: | "Michael Dinkelman" <mwdink@eskimo.com>, "Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer |
From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:21:28 -0000 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> If CW Skimmer is banned in this category, > the temptation to cheat will be almost overwhelming. No more "overwhelming" than sneaking a look at the cluster, or stroking up the amp, or plugging in a low-serial unique here and there. I am absolutely opposed to the mindset of "the cheaters will use it so we gotta allow it". That's a cop out. 73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a boy and his radio" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Julius Fazekas |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Kerr, Prof. K.M. |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Ken Claerbout |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Kerr, Prof. K.M. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |