CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

To: k5zd@charter.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:26:09 EDT
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 4/23/2008 12:12:05 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
k5zd@charter.net writes:

Yes, I  realize that guys using code readers do not pass the "your own  ears"
requirement. Same for RTTY.  Open to suggestion on how to word  this better.





Perhaps something like, "by ear, or electronic decoding operating  
concurrently from the audio presented to the operator's ear".
 
Skimming to find stations is a lot like using sonar to find fish.  If  you 
are fishing as an excuse to drink beer in the sun, you have no need for  sonar. 
 
If you are competing in a fishing tournament, you are competing  based on 
your skill, not on who has the best sonar.  If you are a  commercial fisherman, 
you need sonar to find as many fish as you  can. 
 
To me contesting is like # 2 above. It is a matter of *finding*  and working 
as many people as possible, not just working as many people as  possible.
 
If skimming is to not be used, perhaps we need some volunteers to send code  
practice consisting of DX callsigns.  A human packet spotter would know the  
difference between that and a real station, a skimmer I think not. 
 
 
73  -  Jim   K8MR



**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car 
listings at AOL Autos.      
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>