CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Skimmer ..operator?

To: <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer ..operator?
From: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:54:51 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
...
>> If you consider CW to be something special, a mode that
>> is intended to be decoded by ear (the one thing which
>> sets it apart from all "other" data modes), then that's
>> how you do it - all by yourself.
>>
>> Otherwise, you're a machine operator, not a CW operator.
>>
>> The use of code readers, including Skimmer, is
>> incompatible with unassisted CW entries.
>>
>> 73,
>> Paul EI5DI
>>
>
>Paul,
>
>You have captured the essence of the argument perfectly in those words.

>Thank you!
>
>73, de Hans, K0HB
>Just a boy and his radio


Nearly correct words.
The Skimmer enabled station is maintained by a human sysop.
Not an operator, but a sysop.

Human operated stations will be slow and they can log only stations that
are above the noise.


73,
Jukka OH6LI


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>