CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Skimmer technology will change contesting just as the 
> memory keyer, DVK and computer logging have changed 
> contesting. However, the technology horse is out of 
> the barn and half way to town - unless you are willing 
> to "ban" all technology to the assisted category, a 
> precedent has already been set that says technology 
> is fine as long as it does not involve another operator 
> during the contest. 

There are no technology differences between the single op unassisted and single
op assisted categories with one exception: the delivery of callsigns and
frequencies from an outside source as used in the assisted category.  Whether
that happens via packet radio/net connection or via a piece of computer
software connected to a receiver is irrelevant.   

73
Scott W4PA
 


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>