Thanks for the info, Dave. We all need to rattle cages and make noise.
I did not get to Dayton this year. Thanks for rattling the cage.
K1WHS
On 5/22/2023 9:22 AM, k3sk@buckwalter.co wrote:
I cornered Icom at Hamvention this past weekend and ask if they were ever going
to offer another 222 multi-mode. The initial response I got was that I was
the 3rd or 4th person that had asked that that day! Then after educating
them a little on the current SSB/CW/FT8 activity and telling them about the
recent selling prices on used IC-375A, they seemed interested and said this was
something that would be brought up at post Hamvention discussions with ICOM HQ.
This is a good start, but unless everyone starts contacting them to put a
little pressure in their marketing, I wouldn't hold my breath.
de K3SK
-----Original Message-----
From: David Olean <k1whs@metrocast.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2023 9:37 AM
To: Howard Reynolds <wa3eoq@gmail.com>; vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 222 Activity
Hi Howard
Do not forget that W1GHZ has an inexpensive transverter ckt board available and
you can populate it thru a Bill of Materials list from Mouser. Cheap n Easy!
WW1M and I are going to build one. I think he has ordered two boards for us.
You do have to supply the LO but most people use those synthesizer boards
available from DEMI and Q5 Signal. We will report back as things progress. Now
I know that many people have no time, and others go cross-eyed trying to work
with surface mount parts, but I have had good luck with SM parts so far.
Magnifier glasses and laying off hard drugs helps.
I would agree that the 222 band needs a commercial stand alone rig for many
folks, but in the past, activity on 222 was miniscule. Manufacturers could not
make any money on a 222 rig. Possibly a 222 MHz band could be added now with
technology where it is, with much less effort. I would always go the
transverter route with a high end HF rig rather than a VHF multi mode rig just
because you get more bang for the buck, but many people have the opposite
opinion.
I hope the activity keeps growing on 222 MHz. Increased activity and the attendant
"chatter" will let folks know that 222 is a viable choice. 222 is a great VHF
band. If it was world wide, it would be jam packed!
Dave K1WHS
On 5/20/2023 4:46 PM, Howard Reynolds wrote:
I fully realize that the root cause of no 222 MHz radios is that the
band is only available in Region 2 (and the manufacturers aren't).
However, every once in a while a radio with 222 MHz appears such as
the IC-375 or the Yaesu FT-736R. It's FM, but I've had a Kenwood
TM631A (144 and 220) and an Icom IC-37 for years. Anyway, I keep
hoping that, with sufficient activity in Region 2, the almighty dollar
sign will be ignored. WA3EOQ
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|