VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] 222 Activity

To: "wa3eoq@gmail.com" <wa3eoq@gmail.com>, "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 222 Activity
From: mike repinski via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Reply-to: mikflathead@aol.com
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 20:59:46 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
The Ukrainian, hope the spelling was ok, transverter seem like an economical 
way to get on the band. I would think the antenna would cost more. Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Reynolds <wa3eoq@gmail.com>
To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Sent: Sat, May 20, 2023 4:46 pm
Subject: [VHFcontesting] 222 Activity

I fully realize that the root cause of no 222 MHz radios is that the band
is only available in Region 2 (and the manufacturers aren't).  However,
every once in a while a radio with 222 MHz appears such as the IC-375 or
the Yaesu FT-736R.  It's FM, but I've had a Kenwood TM631A (144 and 220)
and an Icom IC-37 for years.  Anyway, I keep hoping that, with sufficient
activity in Region 2, the almighty dollar sign will be ignored.  WA3EOQ
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>