To: | Stanford VHF email Remailer <VHF@w6yx.stanford.edu> |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] The meaning of coherence [was: [WSVHF] [VHF] VUAC Seeks Input] |
From: | Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:31:11 -0800 (PST) |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
As this thread becomes more incoherant (many of us don't belong to all of the lists cc'd, so our replies will be missed)...I keyed in on the actual request, "to determine if the rule should be modified to make it clearer as to the meaning of coherence." Dear VUCC, You have the advantage. We don't know... ... the intent of the rule's presence in the first place. ... the what way(s) in which the meaning of the term being misunderstood ... what problems this causes for you. As a result, our commentary is "all over the board". Could you clarify these three points? Ev, W2EV _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] VUAC Seeks Input, Christopher Burke |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Updated - Rover activity and otherwise in June ARRL VHF, Nate Duehr |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Re: [WSVHF] [Mw] VUAC Seeks Input, Zack Widup |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] The meaning of coherence [was: [WSVHF] [VHF] VUAC Seeks Input], Fred Lass |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |