VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] More Rules = More Controversy - Again

To: VHFContesting eMail Remailer <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] More Rules = More Controversy - Again
From: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:28:54 -0700
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Dec 17, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Bruce Herrick wrote:

> The one thing the new rules DON'T do is create a single-op class of  
> rover.  Us single-op/driver/logger/etc. still have to compete with  
> rovers that have 2 personnel.  This was a very important issue to me  
> and many others who rove alone, and I think the committee fell down  
> on the job here.  While I don't necessarily rove to win, I'd like to  
> have a chance.  Kind of takes some of the fun out of it.
>
> Bruce WW1M

Nah Bruce, it doesn't take any fun away.  If you get lucky and beat  
the pants off of 'em, your smile when the magazine arrives is even  
bigger.

It's all about perspective.

"Work 'em all and let God sort it out."

--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
nate@natetech.com

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>