VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Farthest FM Contact

To: aa4zz@aol.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Farthest FM Contact
From: curtis roseman <croseman@usc.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:21:00 -0700
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Paul and others: 

In that 1979 September contest we (W9IP multiop) were on top of a 115 foot 
tower on the praries just west of Champaign-Urbana Illinois (now En50).   At 
the last minute we somehow acquired (probably borrowed) a 220 FM rig.  I dont 
remember what we had for an antenna, but I do remember that for the whole 
contest W4BFB was full-queting on 223.5 (until they quit late Sunday 
afternoon).  (This, of course, would reinfoce one of the arguments for not 
using FM in VHF contests, but we need not go there.)

On two and 432 we worked everything from the Dakotas to Texas to Georgia (maybe 
Florida) to New England.  Someday it will happen again. 

73, Curt Roseman k9aks


----- Original Message -----
From: aa4zz@aol.com
Date: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 4:47 am
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Farthest FM Contact
To: ve3cru@rac.ca, vhfcontesting@contesting.com

> ?Back when I in college (1979) I worked from North Carolina to 
> Vermont (before grid squares) on 223.5 FM as part of the W4BFB? #1 
> national? September VHF contest Muti OP. We were running a Midland 
> crystal rig with a 60 watt amp to a Ringo Ranger.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 73 Paul AA4ZZ
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Burgess <ve3cru@rac.ca>
> To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Sent: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 8:51 pm
> Subject: [VHFcontesting] Farthest FM Contact
> 
> 
> 
> Ev and all,
> 
> I note with much interest the distance worked by Ev on FM, the 
> power too.
> FN03 to FN21 with 160 watts to a dipole.
> 
> I run an old IC-3 HT into a little Mirage brick of 20-30 watts on 
> 223.5 into an 
> FO16.  Ran EN94 to FN32 with no problem, was copyable from FN14ba 
> to FN32jp W2SZ 
> with the amp off running 1,5 watts too.
> 
> This past UHF ran K1TEO FN31 from FN14 and FN04 on 222.2 
> horizontal, full 
> quieting, to the surprise of Jeff.  Granted, not omnidirectional, 
> but FM can do 
> more than most give it credit for.  I for one will change 
> polarization and lower 
> the frequency on FM for those not wanting to risk problems of high 
> swr at 223.5, 
> so you don't need to abort a qso and points simply because it is 
> FM when I 
> rover.
> (still working on 222 tvtrs).
> 
> Power is king and antenna is queen?  I think the reverse is true, 
> based on my 
> past experiences.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Bill   VE3CRU/R
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's 
> free from AOL at AOL.com.
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>