Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Choke on feed point of dipole

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Choke on feed point of dipole
From: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:35:21 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I would not hesitate to put up a vertical dipole.

In fact my 30m beam is so directional I'm thinking of putting up one here just to cut down on rotor wear & tear.  Assuming you have the height, It's much simpler physically than doing a vertical as you don't have the ground system to worry about.  And it gets the important current maximum quite a way off the ground.

The "easy" way to do this is to build the dipole as normal. **NO** choke at the feepoint in this case.  The **GROUND** leg of the dipole runs down to ground, next to the coax with the two secured together so they are not blowing around separately.

The important part is to put a serious coax choke at the end of the dipole tip, on the ground side.  That means multiple turns through a couple of type-31 ferrites.

Antenna resonance is trimmed with the tip length at the top assuming you have a pulley to pull it up.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

On 1/13/2026 4:02 AM, Brian Beezley wrote:
Tom Hellem wrote:

"I think the reasonable conclusion is that a center fed vertical dipole is a very difficult thing to make work..."

Tom, at my last QTH I dropped a 40m dipole vertically from a tall eucalyptus. I fed it directly with RG-58 (no choke). The feedline ran roughly horizontal for tens of feet. (The tree was slightly down the slope of a hill from the shack.) SWR was fine. I remember generating pileups during Field Day as a 500 watt home station, but otherwise I was not that impressed with its performance.

The gain and elevation pattern of a vertical antenna are quite sensitive to ground quality. Unless you have really good ground, a horizontal antenna may perform better, even at low angles, if you can put it at a decent height. "Decent" might not be that difficult at 14 MHz and above, but it may be a problem below.

When modeling a vertical antenna, these generic ground constants are much more appropriate than those your antenna analysis program offers:

https://k6sti.neocities.org/hfgc

Brian

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>