Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Choke on feed point of dipole

To: Tom Hellem <tom.hellem@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Choke on feed point of dipole
From: Kelly Taylor via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@me.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:56:44 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
You could also do a vertical dipole the way k9yc did…

Feed it with coax that forms the bottom half and use a choke to set the 
electrical length of the bottom 1/4-wave.

He has a more detailed description on his site.

73, kelly, ve4xt 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 12, 2026, at 23:17, Tom Hellem <tom.hellem@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> My hat is off to all of you fine gentlemen who contributed to this
> discussion.
> You have helped me see the light.
> I think the reasonable conclusion is that a center fed vertical dipole is
> a very difficult thing to make work, especially if the feedline cannot be
> brought away from the antenna horizontally for an appreciable distance.
> I’m going to try base feeding it with an LC network and see if I can get
> better results.
> Many thanks to everyone who provided input.
> 
> Tom
> K0SN
> 
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 6:57 PM Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 1/12/2026 5:23 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
>>> Tom, I'm emphasizing what Jim mentioned earlier.  If the antenna
>>> resonant point moved by adding the choke, then that means the feedline
>>> was participating to some extent as "part of the antenna."
>> 
>> Yes, but in Tom's configuration, even with the world's greatest choke,
>> the feedline can still be a parasitic element.
>>> 
>>> My belief is that without a feedline choke, you simply cannot guarantee
>>> that the feedline will not participate.  So every antenna here (19 of
>>> them) has a feedline choke of some form.
>> 
>> Yes. And feedline chokes also reduce interstation interference, whether
>> SO2R or multi.
>> 
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>