Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Activity by Mode was: Re: Fwd: MFJ QRT on May 17, 2024

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Activity by Mode was: Re: Fwd: MFJ QRT on May 17, 2024
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:33:23 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>


On 4/29/2024 11:08 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:

> Looking at my own RBN node, I routinely spot CW signals with
> signal-to-noise ratios of as little as 4 dB.  To be sure, FT8 is much
> better at signals below the threshold (I see -24 dB signals all the
> time), but 4 dB is pretty weak.  So yes, there will be
> disproportionately more FT8 spots, but the RBN spots many relatively
> weak signals.

CW and FT8 spots/signal reports have completely different reference
levels.  FT8 SNR is in a 2.7 KHz bandwidth while CW is in (maybe) a
100 Hz bandwidth.  20Log(2700/100) = 28(.6) dB ... the -24 dB FT8 spot
would be equivalent to a 4 dB CW spot!

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV

On 4/29/2024 11:08 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
I suspect this thread should move to another reflector, but before it does ... I don't want a few misconceptions to pass uncorrected.

Steve says "note how many timers a CW caller is spotted on RBN while calling in a pileup."  The answer, to the best of our ability, is NONE. It does happen very occasionally when the timing between caller and the called station's CQ is just right, and the caller is within 50 Hz of the CQer, but that's it.  Split callers are never spotted by the RBN.

Steve also asks "where are the RBN spots [in the CWTs?"  The answer is, there are TONS.  I don't have a huge signal, yet I was spotted over 100 times in the last 10 minutes in the 19Z CWT last week.  Yes, I was CQing.

Looking at my own RBN node, I routinely spot CW signals with signal-to-noise ratios of as little as 4 dB.  To be sure, FT8 is much better at signals below the threshold (I see -24 dB signals all the time), but 4 dB is pretty weak.  So yes, there will be disproportionately more FT8 spots, but the RBN spots many relatively weak signals.

I'm not arguing that the RBN is directly, precisely comparable to other tools for measuring activity, but it's what we have for CW.

73, Pete N4ZR




_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>