Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] UV Resistant Ty-Wraps?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] UV Resistant Ty-Wraps?
From: "James C. Garland" <4cx250b@muohio.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:28:05 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
SS Ty-wraps are pricey, about $2/each, last time I checked them. Also, the
kind I saw can't be removed without cutting them, Because they're very flat,
cutting them isn't easy if they're tightly wrapped around a bundle.

**********************
Jim Garland W8ZR
Santa Fe, NM
www.w8zr.net
*********************

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of shack
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:26 PM
To: 'Jim Brown'; 'Tower Talk List'
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] UV Resistant Ty-Wraps?

I see that good old Harbor Freight has stainless Steel tie wraps; they
would definitely be UV proof.  I picked a pack up to try some; the only
problem may be sharp edges.

Mike K6BR

-----Original Message-----
 
I just bought a couple of bags of UV-resistant Ty-Wraps at Home 
Depot. The mfr is Catamount, which is apparently owned by Thomas and 
Betts. Does anyone have experience with products like this? Several 
years ago I bought some no-name blue tywraps that the vendor claimed 
were UV resistant, and they fell apart after only a few months in the 
sun. 

Jim K9YC 


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>