Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year
From: donovanf@erols.com
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 02:29:19 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi Nick, 


W3LPL was multi-single, we spent very limited time 
on Topband except to chase multipliers. 


We worked 160 QSOs, 21 Zones and 70 countries on Topband 


Conditions appeared to be normal to Europe but poor 
on paths crossing the auroral zone such as Zone 16 


There was significantly less Topband activity than in recent years, 
perhaps because both 80 and 40 meters were excellent all night. 


Zone QSOs 01 1 02 1 
03 1 04 16 
05 12 
06 1 
07 2 
08 6 
09 4 
10 1 11 1 
13 1 
14 55 15 47 16 5 20 4 
21 1 
31 1 33 4 35 2 40 1 

73 
Frank 
W3LPL 




----- Original Message -----

From: "uy0zg" <uy0zg@mksat.net> 
To: donovanf@erols.com 
Cc: topband@contesting.com, "Topband" 
<topband-bounces+uy0zg=mksat.net@contesting.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 6:32:05 PM 
Subject: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year 

Hi 

Frank 



May I ask how many QSOs with zone 16 did you have on 160 meters in this 
CQ WW ? 


--- 
Nick, UY0ZG 
http://www.topband.in.ua 

donovanf@erols.com писал 2020-12-01 20:20: 
> Of course Lee is absolutely correct. 
> 
> 
> Many 160 DXers who have had difficulty with receiving antennas 
> have given up too easily during the troubleshooting process. 
> 
> 
> 73 
> Frank 
> W3LPL 
Topband Reflector 

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>