Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year

To: mw_comercial@wp.pl
Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year
From: Mpridesti via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Mpridesti <mpridesti@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:44:33 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Something I did once was to call the suspect station with low power and pointed 
away from him (I have a directional antenna with 15 to 20 dB front to back) and 
still that station heard me! So yep, he was using an SDR in the US while 
operating his transmitter in EU. 

SDR was SW of my location. 

Regards,

Mark, K1RX


> On Dec 1, 2020, at 2:28 PM, mw_comercial@wp.pl wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> isn't the same station that were disquialified in the last CQ 160 exactely 
> for using RX web sdr on other continent?
> 
> There is no need to talk abut miracles, there are at least two easy ways to 
> check if someone from EU is using remote RX in USA:
> 
> 1) listen to the suspicious station on some web sdr in USA. In normal 
> situation there will be stations the guy is not replying to.  If he amazingly 
> replies to all you can hear on sdr, it's 100% he is also there.
> 
> 2) the guy replies to W0, W5 stations (a case from my land) and does not 
> reply to local EU callers. Or replays "later".
> 
> And off course, you must be sure you have good working rx antennas at your 
> QTH. Also, be aware that on 160m 500km can make huge difference in 
> propagation.
> 
> Delays in responding or doublings are not always a proof.
> 
> 73's
> Mac SP2XF / SN2M
> 
> 
> 
> -----Oryginalna wiadomość----- From: uy0zg
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2020 2:18 PM
> To: Tom | SP5XO
> Cc: topband@contesting.com ; Topband
> Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year
> 
> Hi
> 
> Weeks conditions ?
> 
> For the best of the ex USSR countries, this is not a problem!
> 
> 
> Very good HIGH + WEB SDR+ very kind and democratic American judges  =
> 
> 
> super result is ready!
> 
> http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2020-11/msg08693.html
> 
> 
> .........
> 
> 73 !
> 
> ---
> Nick, UY0ZG
> http://www.topband.in.ua
> 
> Tom | SP5XO писал 2020-12-01 14:21:
>> Compare to recent weeks conditions were marginal during CQWW. Only two Zone
>> 4 stations were audible here and it took long time to work them. Whereas a
>> week ago band was wide open from MI, IL to CO or even down to TX.
>> I worked only mults and Dx's this time. Only 13 stations from Zone 5 in my
>> log. Except for VY2ZM all NA's were weak including KC1XX and W3LPL!
>> Hopeful things improve for next weekend and will work some more in ARRL 160.
>> CU
>> Tom
>> sp5xo
>> 
>> Conditions certainly didn't favor 160 over the weekend CQWW contest here in
>>> Florida at least.
>>> 
>>> Looking back in 2019 I worked 50 countries on 160 during CQWW, this year it
>>> was only 17, only 3 Europeans and those were very weak. I'm sure the lack
>>> of expeditions due to CV-19 played a part but on whole I think many guys
>>> in hindsight will be glad they didn't spend the money to go.
>>> 
>>> Maybe things will pick up next weekend for the ARRL 160 test though that 
>>> tends
>>> to be largely a USA to USA test and it is hard to hear the DX through the
>>> local mob
>>> 
>>> CU guys in the pile up
>>> 
>>> Dave
>>> NR1DX
>>> --
>>> Dave Manuals@ArtekManuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector 
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>